Standard roommate rules call for no hooking up with roommates. Exception for if you moved in as a couple/triad/whatever. Didn't you know that?
I've broken that rule, to no bad effect, but I don't believe in roommate rules in general (I've also broken the rule you're citing, in that I visited one girl and hooked up with her and her roomate back and forth for a few days). But if you're gonna stick to roommate rules, all of this is out of bounds :)
at this point, there's nothing more to say that hasn't already been said, but gods the friskiness coming out of the two of you yesterday is deliciously distracting.
as far as the answer to the question, though, I think I'd have to agree with the sentiments of "why does it only have to be one?" roommate rules or no..
I'd be pretty pissed off. But then again, if it were me, there would be two attractive female roommates (on both of whom, it's pretty certain, I would have had some kind of crush) who would have decided that neither should do anything with me.
For maximum fun, the one in whom I was not interested would have won out.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:34 am (UTC)roommate rules
Date: 2005-02-04 03:49 am (UTC)I've broken that rule, to no bad effect, but I don't believe in roommate rules in general (I've also broken the rule you're citing, in that I visited one girl and hooked up with her and her roomate back and forth for a few days). But if you're gonna stick to roommate rules, all of this is out of bounds :)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 01:33 pm (UTC)(This thread has since progressed to the point where I am no longer cool enough to be here.)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 04:13 pm (UTC)pinned, huh?
(This thread has since progressed to the point where I am no longer cool enough to be here.)
time to make some sexy user icons? ; P
(really, there's no such thing, otherwise, i wouldn't be cool enough)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 05:10 am (UTC)...
oh, right, your question. um, anything else would depend on the guy and the roommates, i figure.
y'all were talking generally, right?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 05:16 am (UTC)sure
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:with thanks to both of you
From:no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 03:37 am (UTC);)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-04 04:42 pm (UTC)as far as the answer to the question, though, I think I'd have to agree with the sentiments of "why does it only have to be one?" roommate rules or no..
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 06:16 am (UTC)For maximum fun, the one in whom I was not interested would have won out.
As long as I'm not happy, the universe is good.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-05 07:17 am (UTC)Wary. And Cautiously Optimistic.
:P